• Annals of surgery · Jul 2010

    Hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an audit of 50 consecutive cases.

    • Masato Nagino, Yuji Nimura, Hideki Nishio, Tomoki Ebata, Tsuyoshi Igami, Masahiro Matsushita, Naomichi Nishikimi, and Yuzuru Kamei.
    • Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. nagino@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp
    • Ann. Surg. 2010 Jul 1; 252 (1): 115-23.

    ObjectiveTo outline our experience with hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and to discuss the clinical significance of this challenging hepatectomy.Summary Background DataOnly a few authors reported negative results for this surgery in a very limited number of patients.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of 50 patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma who underwent hepatectomy (left trisectionectomy in 26, left hepatectomy in 23, and right hepatectomy in 1) with simultaneous resection and reconstruction of the portal vein and hepatic artery, focusing on surgical outcome and survival.ResultsThe operative time was 776 +/- 191 minutes, and blood loss was 2593 +/- 1890 mL. Time of vessel resection and reconstruction was 25 +/- 19 minutes for the portal vein and 119 +/- 56 minutes for the hepatic artery. A total of 27 (54.0%) patients developed several kinds of complications, including intra-abdominal abscess (n = 13), wound infection (n = 9), bile leakage from liver stump (n = 9), and liver failure (n = 7). Relaparotomy was necessary in 5 (10.0%) patients. One (2.0%) patient died of a postoperative complication. Microscopic cancer invasion of the resected portal vein was found in 44 (88.0%) patients, while that of the resected hepatic artery was found in 27 (54.0%). The distal bile duct margin, proximal bile duct margin, and radial margin were positive for cancer in 2 (4.0%), 4 (8.0%), and 17 (34.0%) patients, respectively. Consequently, R0 resection was achieved in 33 (66.0%) patients. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 78.9%, 36.3%, and 30.3%, respectively. Survival for 30 patients with pM0 disease who underwent R0 resection was better, being 40.7% at the 3- and 5-year time points.ConclusionMajor hepatectomy with simultaneous resection and reconstruction of the portal vein and hepatic artery is technically demanding. However, this surgery can be performed with acceptable mortality by an experienced surgeon and offers a better chance of long-term survival in selected patients.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.