• Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2010

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    The influence of time of day of administration on duration of opioid labor analgesia.

    • Barbara M Scavone, Robert J McCarthy, Cynthia A Wong, and John T Sullivan.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg, School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. bimscavone@aol.com
    • Anesth. Analg. 2010 Oct 1;111(4):986-91.

    BackgroundMedications administered into the epidural or intrathecal space for labor analgesia may demonstrate variable effects dependent on time of day, and this may affect clinical research trials investigating the pharmacology of specific drugs. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the effect of time of day of administration of intrathecal fentanyl and systemic hydromorphone labor analgesia from data collected as part of a randomized clinical trial examining the influence of analgesia method on labor outcome.MethodsSix hundred ninety-two healthy parturients were randomized early in labor to receive combined spinal-epidural (intrathecal fentanyl 25 μg followed by a lidocaine and epinephrine containing epidural test dose) versus systemic (hydromorphone 1 mg IV and 1 mg IM) labor analgesia at first analgesia request. No further analgesics were administered until the patient requested additional analgesia (second analgesia request). Subjects were assigned to the daytime group (DAY) if initial analgesia (neuraxial or systemic) was administered between the hours of 07:01 and 23:00 and to the nighttime group (NIGHT) if it was administered between 23:01 and 07:00. Within each mode of analgesia study arm (neuraxial or systemic), the DAY and NIGHT groups were compared. The primary outcome variable was analgesia duration, defined as the time interval from administration of labor analgesia until the second analgesia request. Cervical dilation at first and second analgesia requests, pain score at first analgesia request, and average amount of pain between analgesia administration and second analgesia request were also compared between DAY and NIGHT groups. Rhythm analyses for duration of analgesia, cervical dilation, and pain scores were performed.ResultsThere was no difference in the median duration of either neuraxial or systemic analgesia in DAY versus NIGHT subjects, and no harmonic variation was observed for analgesia duration. Rhythm analysis demonstrated a 24-h harmonic cycle for cervical dilation at first analgesia request with maximum values occurring near 17:00 and minimum values near 05:00, but the amplitude of the difference was very small. Rhythm analysis demonstrated a 24-h harmonic cycle with maximum values occurring near 22:00 and minimum values near 10:00 for the average amount of pain between analgesia administration and second analgesia request in neuraxial group patients, but amplitude was small.ConclusionsTime of day of administration did not seem to influence combined spinal-epidural or systemic labor analgesia duration under these study conditions.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.