• Biochemical pharmacology · Mar 1992

    Comparative Study

    Effects of the modulating agent WR2721 and its main metabolites on the formation and stability of cisplatin-DNA adducts in vitro in comparison to the effects of thiosulphate and diethyldithiocarbamate.

    • M Treskes, L G Nijtmans, A M Fichtinger-Schepman, and W J van der Vijgh.
    • Department of Oncology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    • Biochem. Pharmacol. 1992 Mar 3; 43 (5): 1013-9.

    AbstractThe influence of the modulating agent WR2721, its active thiol-metabolite WR1065 and the symmetrical disulphide WR33278 on the in vitro formation and stability of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin, CDDP)-DNA adducts was investigated and compared with the effects of the highly nucleophilic modulating agents diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) and thiosulphate (TS). Salmon sperm DNA (0.5 mg/mL) was incubated with 25 micrograms/mL (83 microM) cisplatin for 1 hr in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 at 37 degrees in the absence or presence of modulating agent. DDTC and TS were potent inhibitors of the platination of the DNA (95 and 89%, respectively, with 4.2 mM of modulating agent). The WR-compounds were also remarkably active in the inhibition of DNA platination. Prevention of adduct formation in the presence of 4.2 mM WR-compound decreased in the order WR1065 (74%) greater than WR33278 (63%) greater than WR2721 (51%). The prevention of CDDP-DNA adduct formation by WR1065 was strongly concentration-dependent up to 4.2 mM but at higher concentrations this protection hardly increased at all. In the presence of the modulating agents, increased levels of CDDP monofunctionally bound to a guanine residue were observed with a simultaneous decrease in the relative abundance of bifunctional adducts. All modulators were also able to reverse part of the CDDP-DNA adducts formed. After a 2-hr incubation of already platinated salmon sperm DNA with 4.2 mM of modulating agent, the removal of Pt from DNA amounted to about 43% with DDTC, 28% with WR1065 and 13-14% with TS, WR2721 and WR33278. Even CDDP bifunctionally bound to two adjacent guanines in the same DNA strand, which is considered to be a very stable adduct, was partly reversed. Our observations suggest that WR2721, especially when administered prior to or concomitantly with CDDP, can be expected to protect those tissues from CDDP-induced damage to DNA that are able to efficiently dephosphorylate WR2721 followed by uptake of the thiol metabolite WR1065. This stresses the importance of a selective formation and uptake of WR1065 by non-tumour tissues for the successful use of WR2721 as a protective agent in combination with platinum-based cancer chemotherapy.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…