• Audrey de Nazelle, Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen, Josep M Antó, Michael Brauer, David Briggs, Charlotte Braun-Fahrlander, Nick Cavill, Ashley R Cooper, Hélène Desqueyroux, Scott Fruin, Gerard Hoek, PanisLuc IntLI, Nicole Janssen, Michael Jerrett, Michael Joffe, AndersenZorana JovanovicZJ, Elise van Kempen, Simon Kingham, Nadine Kubesch, Kevin M Leyden, Julian D Marshall, Jaume Matamala, Giorgos Mellios, Michelle Mendez, Hala Nassif, David Ogilvie, Rosana Peiró, Katherine Pérez, Ari Rabl, Martina Ragettli, Daniel Rodríguez, David Rojas, Pablo Ruiz, James F Sallis, Jeroen Terwoert, Jean-François Toussaint, Jouni Tuomisto, Moniek Zuurbier, and Erik Lebret.
• Center for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain. anazelle@creal.cat
• Environ Int. 2011 May 1; 37 (4): 766-77.

BackgroundSubstantial policy changes to control obesity, limit chronic disease, and reduce air pollution emissions, including greenhouse gasses, have been recommended. Transportation and planning policies that promote active travel by walking and cycling can contribute to these goals, potentially yielding further co-benefits. Little is known, however, about the interconnections among effects of policies considered, including potential unintended consequences.Objectives And MethodsWe review available literature regarding health impacts from policies that encourage active travel in the context of developing health impact assessment (HIA) models to help decision-makers propose better solutions for healthy environments. We identify important components of HIA models of modal shifts in active travel in response to transport policies and interventions.Results And DiscussionPolicies that increase active travel are likely to generate large individual health benefits through increases in physical activity for active travelers. Smaller, but population-wide benefits could accrue through reductions in air and noise pollution. Depending on conditions of policy implementations, risk tradeoffs are possible for some individuals who shift to active travel and consequently increase inhalation of air pollutants and exposure to traffic injuries. Well-designed policies may enhance health benefits through indirect outcomes such as improved social capital and diet, but these synergies are not sufficiently well understood to allow quantification at this time.ConclusionEvaluating impacts of active travel policies is highly complex; however, many associations can be quantified. Identifying health-maximizing policies and conditions requires integrated HIAs.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

29 keywords...

hide…