• Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Oct 1993

    Comparative Study

    Breast-conserving surgery and definitive radiation: a comparison between quadrantectomy and local excision with special focus on local-regional control and cosmesis.

    • M A Fagundes, H M Fagundes, C S Brito, M H Fagundes, A Daudt, L A Bruno, S J Azevedo, and L A Fagundes.
    • University of Miami School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, FL 33101.
    • Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1993 Oct 20; 27 (3): 553-60.

    PurposeBreast-conserving surgery and definitive radiation as an alternative to mastectomy is a well-accepted practice. However, there is limited information addressing the extent of surgical resection. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of patients treated with local excision or quadrantectomy, followed by definitive radiation with particular emphasis on local-regional control and cosmetic results.Methods And MaterialsBetween 1978 and 1989, 425 patients with Stage I and II breast cancer underwent conservative surgery followed by definitive radiation. Fifty-four patients had a local excision and 371 had a quadrantectomy. Median follow-up was 42 months. Axillary dissection (levels I/II) was performed in 317 patients, and of these 126 patients had positive axillary lymph nodes. Radiation consisted of 4500-5000 cGy to the breast with Co60 or 4 MV photons, plus a boost to the tumor site (356/425 patients) for a total dose of 6000-6500 cGy. Treatment of the regional lymph nodes was given to patients with undissected or inadequately dissected axillas and usually to patients with multiple positive lymph nodes. Of the patients with positive lymph nodes, 46% received systemic chemotherapy.ResultsThe 5-year actuarial freedom from local-regional recurrence rates for patients treated with local excision and quadrantectomy followed by definitive radiation were 92% and 93%, respectively (p = 0.7). The 5-year actuarial survival rates for local excision and quadrantectomy were as follows: overall (83% and 82%; p = 0.7), cause-specific disease-free (74% and 71%; p = 0.9), and distant disease-free (82% and 76%, p = 0.4). Estimated 10-year results are also presented. Cosmetic analysis required a minimum follow-up of 5 years. In the local excision, 77% of the patients had excellent-good result, compared to 53% following quadrantectomy (p = 0.03). Excluding patients who received chemotherapy, the excellent-good scores were 76% and 57%, respectively (p = 0.1). The most unfavorable cosmetic results were associated with quadrantectomy followed by radiation with boost dose and chemotherapy, excellent-good in 22%.ConclusionConservative surgery consisting of local excision or quadrantectomy resulted in comparable local-regional control, overall, disease-free and distant disease-free survival, although cosmetic results were superior in the local excision group.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.