• Yazhou He, Xue Li, Danijela Gasevic, Eleanor Brunt, Fiona McLachlan, Marisa Millenson, Maria Timofeeva, IoannidisJohn P AJPAStanford University School of Medicine and Stanford University, Stanford, California (J.P.I.)., Harry Campbell, and Evropi Theodoratou.
• University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, and Sichuan University West China School of Medicine, Chengdu, People's Republic of China (Y.H.).
• Ann. Intern. Med. 2018 Oct 16; 169 (8): 543-553.

BackgroundMany effects of statins on non-cardiovascular disease (non-CVD) outcomes have been reported.PurposeTo evaluate the quantity, validity, and credibility of evidence regarding associations between statins and non-CVD outcomes and the effects of statins on these outcomes.Data SourcesMEDLINE and EMBASE (English terms only, inception to 28 May 2018).Study SelectionMeta-analyses (published in English) of observational studies and of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined non-CVD outcomes of statin intake.Data ExtractionTwo investigators extracted data from meta-analyses and individual studies. Credibility assessments based on summary effect sizes from a random-effects model, between-study heterogeneity, 95% prediction interval, small-study effect, excess significance, and credibility ceilings were devised to classify evidence.Data SynthesisThis review explored 278 unique non-CVD outcomes from 112 meta-analyses of observational studies and 144 meta-analyses of RCTs. For observational studies, no convincing (class I) evidence, 2 highly suggestive (class II) associations (decreased cancer mortality in patients with cancer and decreased exacerbation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), 21 suggestive (class III) associations, and 42 weak (class IV) associations were identified. One outcome from the RCTs (decreased all-cause mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease) attained a sufficient amount of evidence with no hints of bias. For adverse events, observational studies showed suggestive evidence that statins increase the risk for diabetes and myopathy. Among the RCTs, no statistically significant effects were found on myopathy, myalgia, or rhabdomyolysis.LimitationsStudies with relevant data and outcomes not included in the meta-analyses may have been missed. Credibility assessments relied on several assumptions and arbitrary thresholds.ConclusionThe absence of convincing evidence of an association between statins and non-CVD outcomes supports leaving the current recommendations unchanged.Primary Funding SourceNone.

17 keywords...

hide…