• David Mikhail, Kari L Visscher, Nancy Chen, Joy Wang, Barry Y Emara, and Cindy M Hutnik.
• Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.. Electronic address: dmikhail2013@gmail.com.
• Can J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb 1; 50 (1): 19-25.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the literacy level of patients with glaucoma in a tertiary care teaching centre compared with a rural community centre and to assess comprehension of and preference for educational material written at different reading levels.DesignProspective, randomized, double-blinded study.ParticipantsPatients with glaucoma presenting for routine examination or referral at a tertiary care academic centre in southwestern Ontario and a single general ophthalmology clinic located in a moderately sized suburban community in Ontario, Canada, were invited to participate in this study. Patients aged 19 to 90 with sufficient visual acuity to read the pamphlets were recruited.MethodsEligible and consenting participants underwent a validated literacy study, and their literacy levels were classified as adequate, barely adequate, marginal, or inadequate. They were then randomized to receive educational pamphlets written at either a grade 5 (intervention group) or grade 10 (control group) reading level. Comprehension of and preference for the material were determined by analysis of cloze testing and a feedback questionnaire.ResultsOf 199 participants, 179 were included in the analysis. The literacy testing found that 35% of patients in the community practice and 30% in the tertiary care academic centre had "marginal" or "inadequate" literacy skills, but there was no significant difference between sites (p = 0.77). Comprehension of the educational material was higher in the intervention group versus the control group (p = 0.0057), with a mean cloze score of 57.9% in the intervention group and 48.3% in the control group. The intervention group spent significantly less time reading the pamphlets (p < 0.0001), with an average of 2.52 minutes compared with 4.51 minutes. The feedback survey indicated that patients found the pamphlet with the lower reading level easier to read (p = 0.02), which was reflected in their comments as well.ConclusionsIn both academic and community practice settings, about 30% of patients with glaucoma have marginal or inadequate literacy skills. However, regardless of practice, all patients better comprehend, and were more receptive to, educational material written at grade 5 reading level with illustrations, regardless of initial literacy level.Copyright © 2015 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

26 keywords...

hide…