• Barbara Carl, Miriam Bopp, Benjamin Saß, Mirza Pojskic, Benjamin Voellger, and Christopher Nimsky.
• Department of Neurosurgery, University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
• Global Spine J. 2020 Apr 1; 10 (2 Suppl): 41S-55S.

Study DesignA prospective, case-based, observational study.ObjectivesTo investigate how microscope-based augmented reality (AR) support can be utilized in various types of spine surgery.MethodsIn 42 spinal procedures (12 intra- and 8 extradural tumors, 7 other intradural lesions, 11 degenerative cases, 2 infections, and 2 deformities) AR was implemented using operating microscope head-up displays (HUDs). Intraoperative low-dose computed tomography was used for automatic registration. Nonlinear image registration was applied to integrate multimodality preoperative images. Target and risk structures displayed by AR were defined in preoperative images by automatic anatomical mapping and additional manual segmentation.ResultsAR could be successfully applied in all 42 cases. Low-dose protocols ensured a low radiation exposure for registration scanning (effective dose cervical 0.29 ± 0.17 mSv, thoracic 3.40 ± 2.38 mSv, lumbar 3.05 ± 0.89 mSv). A low registration error (0.87 ± 0.28 mm) resulted in a reliable AR representation with a close matching of visualized objects and reality, distinctly supporting anatomical orientation in the surgical field. Flexible AR visualization applying either the microscope HUD or video superimposition, including the ability to selectively activate objects of interest, as well as different display modes allowed a smooth integration in the surgical workflow, without disturbing the actual procedure. On average, 7.1 ± 4.6 objects were displayed visualizing target and risk structures reliably.ConclusionsMicroscope-based AR can be applied successfully to various kinds of spinal procedures. AR improves anatomical orientation in the surgical field supporting the surgeon, as well as it offers a potential tool for education.© The Author(s) 2019.

7 keywords...

hide…