• Ann. Intern. Med. · Jul 2014

    Personalizing age of cancer screening cessation based on comorbid conditions: model estimates of harms and benefits.

    • Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Roman Gulati, Angela B Mariotto, Clyde B Schechter, Tiago M de Carvalho, Amy B Knudsen, Nicolien T van Ravesteyn, Eveline A M Heijnsdijk, Chester Pabiniak, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Carolyn M Rutter, Karen M Kuntz, Eric J Feuer, Ruth Etzioni, Harry J de Koning, Ann G Zauber, and Jeanne S Mandelblatt.
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2014 Jul 15; 161 (2): 104112104-12.

    BackgroundHarms and benefits of cancer screening depend on age and comorbid conditions, but reliable estimates are lacking.ObjectiveTo estimate the harms and benefits of cancer screening by age and comorbid conditions to inform decisions about screening cessation.DesignCollaborative modeling with 7 cancer simulation models and common data on average and comorbid condition level-specific life expectancy.SettingU.S. population.PatientsU.S. cohorts aged 66 to 90 years in 2010 with average health or 1 of 4 comorbid condition levels: none, mild, moderate, or severe.InterventionMammography, prostate-specific antigen testing, or fecal immunochemical testing.MeasurementsLifetime cancer deaths prevented and life-years gained (benefits); false-positive test results and overdiagnosed cancer cases (harms). For each comorbid condition level, the age at which harms and benefits of screening were similar to that for persons with average health having screening at age 74 years.ResultsScreening 1000 women with average life expectancy at age 74 years for breast cancer resulted in 79 to 96 (range across models) false-positive results, 0.5 to 0.8 overdiagnosed cancer cases, and 0.7 to 0.9 prevented cancer deaths. Although absolute numbers of harms and benefits differed across cancer sites, the ages at which to cease screening were consistent across models and cancer sites. For persons with no, mild, moderate, and severe comorbid conditions, screening until ages 76, 74, 72, and 66 years, respectively, resulted in harms and benefits similar to average-health persons.LimitationComorbid conditions influenced only life expectancy.ConclusionComorbid conditions are an important determinant of harms and benefits of screening. Estimates of screening benefits and harms by comorbid condition can inform discussions between providers and patients about personalizing screening cessation decisions.Primary Funding SourceNational Cancer Institute and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…