• PLoS medicine · Oct 2021

    Recommended reporting items for epidemic forecasting and prediction research: The EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines.

    • Simon Pollett, Michael A Johansson, Nicholas G Reich, David Brett-Major, Sara Y Del Valle, Srinivasan Venkatramanan, Rachel Lowe, Travis Porco, BerryIrina MaljkovicIM0000-0001-8555-5352Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America., Alina Deshpande, KraemerMoritz U GMUGDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom., David L Blazes, Wirichada Pan-Ngum, Alessandro Vespigiani, Suzanne E Mate, Sheetal P Silal, Sasikiran Kandula, Rachel Sippy, Talia M Quandelacy, Jeffrey J Morgan, Jacob Ball, Lindsay C Morton, Benjamin M Althouse, Julie Pavlin, Wilbert van Panhuis, Steven Riley, Matthew Biggerstaff, Cecile Viboud, Oliver Brady, and Caitlin Rivers.
    • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
    • PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 1; 18 (10): e1003793e1003793.

    BackgroundThe importance of infectious disease epidemic forecasting and prediction research is underscored by decades of communicable disease outbreaks, including COVID-19. Unlike other fields of medical research, such as clinical trials and systematic reviews, no reporting guidelines exist for reporting epidemic forecasting and prediction research despite their utility. We therefore developed the EPIFORGE checklist, a guideline for standardized reporting of epidemic forecasting research.Methods And FindingsWe developed this checklist using a best-practice process for development of reporting guidelines, involving a Delphi process and broad consultation with an international panel of infectious disease modelers and model end users. The objectives of these guidelines are to improve the consistency, reproducibility, comparability, and quality of epidemic forecasting reporting. The guidelines are not designed to advise scientists on how to perform epidemic forecasting and prediction research, but rather to serve as a standard for reporting critical methodological details of such studies.ConclusionsThese guidelines have been submitted to the EQUATOR network, in addition to hosting by other dedicated webpages to facilitate feedback and journal endorsement.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…