• Pediatric pulmonology · Aug 2020

    Accuracy of volume and pressure delivery by mechanical ventilators in use in neonatal intensive care units: A quality control study.

    • Valeria Ottaviani, Chiara Veneroni, Valentina Dell'Orto, Anna Lavizzari, Maria Luisa Ventura, Marta Tossici, Iwona Maroszynska, Fabio Mosca, Paolo Tagliabue, Daniele De Luca, and Raffaele L Dellacà.
    • Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano University, Milan, Italy.
    • Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2020 Aug 1; 55 (8): 1955-1962.

    ObjectiveDespite technical specifications of neonatal mechanical ventilators (MVs) guarantee clinically irrelevant discrepancies between the set and the delivered values of ventilation parameters, previous studies reported large deviations. Most studies characterized performances of a given model/brand by studying a single device, disregarding possible intramodel differences, and leaving the accuracy of the ventilation parameters effectively delivered in clinical settings unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life accuracy of pressure and volume parameters delivered by neonatal ventilators ready to be used on patients in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).Study DesignIn vitro study.Subjects SelectionNeonatal ventilators (n = 33 of 8 different models) available in four European NICUs.MethodologyThe MVs were connected to a test lung (resistance = 50 cmH2 O*s/L, compliance = 0.35 mL/cmH2 O) provided with pressure and flow sensors. MVs were tested over two different ventilation modes randomly: (a) pressure controlled (PC) with a peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) of 22 cmH2 O, and (b) PC with volume targeted ventilation (VTV) with a tidal volume (VT ) of 6 mL. In all tests, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was set to 6 cmH2 O, respiratory rate to 45 breaths/min, inspiratory time to 0.33 seconds, and oxygen fraction to 0.3.ResultsDuring PC the median (min-max) values delivered were: PEEP = 5.84(4.95-6.48) cmH2 O, PIP = 21.63(20.04-22.62) cmH2 O. During VTV, VT was 5.94(4.63-8.01) mL. VT was considerably variable, ranging from -22% to +33% of the set and displayed values. Differences in accuracy among devices of the same model were comparable to those found among different models.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that loss of accuracy in ventilation variables is likely related to daily use of the devices rather than weakness in the design or manufacturing process, urging the improvement of maintenance and quality control procedures to preserve the performances of neonatal MVs during their entire lifespan.© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…