• J. Clin. Oncol. · Jul 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus FAC followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: results from the GEICAM/2003-02 study.

    • Miguel Martín, Amparo Ruiz, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Agustí Barnadas, Sonia González, Lourdes Calvo, Mireia Margelí Vila, Antonio Antón, Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Miguel Angel Seguí-Palmer, Montserrat Muñoz-Mateu, Joan Dorca Ribugent, José Manuel López-Vega, Carlos Jara, Enrique Espinosa, César Mendiola Fernández, Raquel Andrés, Nuria Ribelles, Arrate Plazaola, Pedro Sánchez-Rovira, Javier Salvador Bofill, Carmen Crespo, Francisco J Carabantes, Sonia Servitja, José Ignacio Chacón, César A Rodríguez, Blanca Hernando, Isabel Álvarez, Eva Carrasco, and Ana Lluch.
    • Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, Dr. Esquerdo 46, Madrid 28009, Spain. mmartin@geicam.org
    • J. Clin. Oncol. 2013 Jul 10; 31 (20): 2593-9.

    PurposeAdding taxanes to anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy improves survival outcomes of patients with node-positive breast cancer (BC). Currently, however, most patients with BC are node negative at diagnosis. The only pure node-negative study (Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group 9805) reported so far showed a docetaxel benefit but significant toxicity. Here we tested the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel (wP) in node-negative patients, which is yet to be established.Patients And MethodsPatients with BC having T1-T3/N0 tumors and at least one high-risk factor for recurrence (according to St. Gallen 1998 criteria) were eligible. After primary surgery, 1,925 patients were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) × 6 or FAC × 4 followed by wP × 8 (FAC-wP). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) after a median follow-up of 5 years. Secondary end points included toxicity and overall survival.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 63.3 months, 93% and 90.3% of patients receiving FAC-wP or FAC regimens, respectively, remained disease free (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99; log-rank P = .04). Thirty-one patients receiving FAC-wP versus 40 patients receiving FAC died (one and seven from cardiovascular diseases, respectively; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.26; log-rank P = .31). The most relevant grade 3 and 4 adverse events in the FAC-wP versus the FAC arm were febrile neutropenia (2.7% v 3.6%), fatigue (7.9% v 3.4%), and sensory neuropathy (5.5% v 0%).ConclusionFor patients with high-risk node-negative BC, the adjuvant FAC-wP regimen was associated with a small but significant improvement in DFS compared with FAC therapy, in addition to manageable toxicity, especially regarding long-term cardiac effects.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…