-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus FAC followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: results from the GEICAM/2003-02 study.
- Miguel Martín, Amparo Ruiz, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Agustí Barnadas, Sonia González, Lourdes Calvo, Mireia Margelí Vila, Antonio Antón, Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Miguel Angel Seguí-Palmer, Montserrat Muñoz-Mateu, Joan Dorca Ribugent, José Manuel López-Vega, Carlos Jara, Enrique Espinosa, César Mendiola Fernández, Raquel Andrés, Nuria Ribelles, Arrate Plazaola, Pedro Sánchez-Rovira, Javier Salvador Bofill, Carmen Crespo, Francisco J Carabantes, Sonia Servitja, José Ignacio Chacón, César A Rodríguez, Blanca Hernando, Isabel Álvarez, Eva Carrasco, and Ana Lluch.
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, Dr. Esquerdo 46, Madrid 28009, Spain. mmartin@geicam.org
- J. Clin. Oncol. 2013 Jul 10; 31 (20): 2593-9.
PurposeAdding taxanes to anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy improves survival outcomes of patients with node-positive breast cancer (BC). Currently, however, most patients with BC are node negative at diagnosis. The only pure node-negative study (Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group 9805) reported so far showed a docetaxel benefit but significant toxicity. Here we tested the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel (wP) in node-negative patients, which is yet to be established.Patients And MethodsPatients with BC having T1-T3/N0 tumors and at least one high-risk factor for recurrence (according to St. Gallen 1998 criteria) were eligible. After primary surgery, 1,925 patients were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) × 6 or FAC × 4 followed by wP × 8 (FAC-wP). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) after a median follow-up of 5 years. Secondary end points included toxicity and overall survival.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 63.3 months, 93% and 90.3% of patients receiving FAC-wP or FAC regimens, respectively, remained disease free (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99; log-rank P = .04). Thirty-one patients receiving FAC-wP versus 40 patients receiving FAC died (one and seven from cardiovascular diseases, respectively; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.26; log-rank P = .31). The most relevant grade 3 and 4 adverse events in the FAC-wP versus the FAC arm were febrile neutropenia (2.7% v 3.6%), fatigue (7.9% v 3.4%), and sensory neuropathy (5.5% v 0%).ConclusionFor patients with high-risk node-negative BC, the adjuvant FAC-wP regimen was associated with a small but significant improvement in DFS compared with FAC therapy, in addition to manageable toxicity, especially regarding long-term cardiac effects.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.