-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Intensive intraoperative insulin therapy versus conventional glucose management during cardiac surgery: a randomized trial.
- Gunjan Y Gandhi, Gregory A Nuttall, Martin D Abel, Charles J Mullany, Hartzell V Schaff, Peter C O'Brien, Matthew G Johnson, Arthur R Williams, Susanne M Cutshall, Lisa M Mundy, Robert A Rizza, and M Molly McMahon.
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. gandhi.gunjan@mayo.edu
- Ann. Intern. Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):233-43.
BackgroundIt is not known whether rigorous intraoperative glycemic control reduces death and morbidity in cardiac surgery patients.ObjectiveTo compare outcomes of intensive insulin therapy during cardiac surgery with those of conventional intraoperative glucose management.DesignA randomized, open-label, controlled trial with blinded end point assessment.SettingTertiary care center.PatientsAdults with and without diabetes who were undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was a composite of death, sternal infections, prolonged ventilation, cardiac arrhythmias, stroke, and renal failure within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital.InterventionPatients were randomly assigned to receive continuous insulin infusion to maintain intraoperative glucose levels between 4.4 (80 mg/dL) and 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) (n = 199) or conventional treatment (n = 201). Patients in the conventional treatment group were not given insulin during surgery unless glucose levels were greater than 11.1 mmol/L (>200 mg/dL). Both groups were treated with insulin infusion to maintain normoglycemia after surgery.ResultsMean glucose concentrations were statistically significantly lower in the intensive treatment group at the end of surgery (6.3 mmol/L [SD, 1.6] [114 mg/dL {SD, 29}] in the intensive treatment group vs. 8.7 mmol/L [SD, 2.3] [157 mg/dL {SD, 42}] in the conventional treatment group; difference, -2.4 mmol/L [95% CI, -2.8 to -1.9 mmol/L] [-43 mg/dL {CI, -50 to -35 mg/dL}]). Eighty two of 185 patients (44%) in the intensive treatment group and 86 of 186 patients (46%) in the conventional treatment group had an event (risk ratio, 1.0 [CI, 0.8 to 1.2]). More deaths (4 deaths vs. 0 deaths; P = 0.061) and strokes (8 strokes vs. 1 strokes; P = 0.020) occurred in the intensive treatment group. Length of stay in the intensive care unit (mean, 2 days [SD, 2] vs. 2 days [SD, 3]; difference, 0 days [CI, -1 to 1 days]) and in the hospital (mean, 8 days [SD, 4] vs. 8 days [SD, 5]; difference, 0 days [CI, -1 to 0 days]) was similar for both groups.LimitationsThis single-center study used a composite end point and could not examine whether outcomes differed by diabetes status.ConclusionsIntensive insulin therapy during cardiac surgery does not reduce perioperative death or morbidity. The increased incidence of death and stroke in the intensive treatment group raises concern about routine implementation of this intervention.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.