• Sandy L Dong, Michael J Bullard, David P Meurer, Sandra Blitz, Brian R Holroyd, and Brian H Rowe.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
• Can J Emerg Med. 2007 Jul 1;9(4):260-6.

ObjectivesEmergency department (ED) triage prioritizes patients based on urgency of care, and the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) is the national standard. We describe the inter-rater agreement and manual overrides of nurses using a CTAS-compliant web-based triage tool (eTRIAGE) for 2 different intensities of staff training.MethodsThis prospective study was conducted in an urban tertiary care ED. In phase 1, eTRIAGE was deployed after a 3-hour training course for 24 triage nurses who were asked to share this knowledge during regular triage shifts with colleagues who had not received training (n = 77). In phase 2, a targeted group of 8 triage nurses underwent further training with eTRIAGE. In each phase, patients were assessed first by the duty triage nurse and then by a blinded independent study nurse, both using eTRIAGE. Inter-rater agreement was calculated using kappa (weighted kappa) statistics.ResultsIn phase 1, 569 patients were enrolled with 513 (90.2%) complete records; 577 patients were enrolled in phase 2 with 555 (96.2%) complete records. Inter-rater agreement during phase 1 was moderate (weighted kappa = 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.62); agreement improved in phase 2 (weighted kappa = 0.65; 95% CI 0.60-0.70). Manual overrides of eTRIAGE scores were infrequent (approximately 10%) during both periods.ConclusionsAgreement between study nurses and duty triage nurses, both using eTRIAGE, was moderate to good, with a trend toward improvement with additional training. Triage overrides were infrequent. Continued attempts to refine the triage process and training appear warranted.

22 keywords...

hide…