• Annals of surgery · Dec 2022

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Treatment of Surgical Scars with Combination Pulsed Dye and Fractional Nonablative Laser: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    • Bianca Y Kang, Sarah A Ibrahim, Alexandra Weil, Kelly A Reynolds, Tyler Johnson, Sarah Wilson, Ming H Lee, KimJohn Y SJYSDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL., McKenzie A Dirr, Emily Poon, and Murad Alam.
    • Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
    • Ann. Surg. 2022 Dec 1; 276 (6): 975980975-980.

    ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness and safety of combined pulsed-dye laser (PDL) and NAFL for treatment of surgical scars.Summary Background DataPDL and NAFL have not been compared to healing by time alone.MethodsRandomized controlled, single-blinded clinical trial at an urban, university hospital. Healthy adults' status post skin surgery with primary closure were randomized to either 3 sessions of combination PDL and NAFL every 2 to 8 weeks, or control of no treatment. At baseline and 36-week follow-up, Patient and observer Scar Assessment Scale and Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating were completed by participants and blinded physicians. The primary outcome was scar improvement, as measured by the score difference over time.ResultsOf 76 participants, 52 completed the study (July 2017 to June 2019). No severe adverse events were reported. Patient and observer Scar Assessment Scale assessments demonstrated improvement in total score in the laser group compared to controls, as reported by patients [mean difference (standard deviation), laser: 12.86 (6.91) vs control: 7.25 (6.34); P = 0.004] and blinded physicians [18.32 (8.69) vs 13.08 (9.63); P = 0.044]. Patients observed a greater improvement in scar thickness [3.68 (2.04) vs 1.88 (1.85); P = 0.002] and stiffness [3.57 (2.78) vs 1.50 (2.11); P = 0.004] with lasers, and physicians reported greater improvement in vascularity [3.71 (1.98) vs 1.71 (1.52); P = 0.0002]. The live Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating subscore for erythema improved significantly with lasers [1.04 (0.79) vs 0.42 (0.50); P = 0.001].Conclusions And RelevanceCombined PDL and NAFL resulted in scar improvement. Scar thickness, stiffness, and erythema were improved.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03057964).Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…