-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Randomized controlled trial of a video decision support tool for cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making in advanced cancer.
- Angelo E Volandes, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Susan L Mitchell, Areej El-Jawahri, Aretha Delight Davis, Michael J Barry, Kevan L Hartshorn, Vicki Ann Jackson, Muriel R Gillick, Elizabeth S Walker-Corkery, Yuchiao Chang, Lenny López, Margaret Kemeny, Linda Bulone, Eileen Mann, Sumi Misra, Matt Peachey, Elmer D Abbo, April F Eichler, Andrew S Epstein, Ariela Noy, Tomer T Levin, and Jennifer S Temel.
- Massachusetts General Hospital, General Medicine Unit, 50 Staniford St, 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA. avolandes@partners.org
- J. Clin. Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):380-6.
PurposeDecision making regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is challenging. This study examined the effect of a video decision support tool on CPR preferences among patients with advanced cancer.Patients And MethodsWe performed a randomized controlled trial of 150 patients with advanced cancer from four oncology centers. Participants in the control arm (n = 80) listened to a verbal narrative describing CPR and the likelihood of successful resuscitation. Participants in the intervention arm (n = 70) listened to the identical narrative and viewed a 3-minute video depicting a patient on a ventilator and CPR being performed on a simulated patient. The primary outcome was participants' preference for or against CPR measured immediately after exposure to either modality. Secondary outcomes were participants' knowledge of CPR (score range of 0 to 4, with higher score indicating more knowledge) and comfort with video.ResultsThe mean age of participants was 62 years (standard deviation, 11 years); 49% were women, 44% were African American or Latino, and 47% had lung or colon cancer. After the verbal narrative, in the control arm, 38 participants (48%) wanted CPR, 41 (51%) wanted no CPR, and one (1%) was uncertain. In contrast, in the intervention arm, 14 participants (20%) wanted CPR, 55 (79%) wanted no CPR, and 1 (1%) was uncertain (unadjusted odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.7 to 7.2; P < .001). Mean knowledge scores were higher in the intervention arm than in the control arm (3.3 ± 1.0 v 2.6 ± 1.3, respectively; P < .001), and 65 participants (93%) in the intervention arm were comfortable watching the video.ConclusionParticipants with advanced cancer who viewed a video of CPR were less likely to opt for CPR than those who listened to a verbal narrative.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.