-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Effect of a Digital Health Intervention on Receipt of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- David P Miller, Nancy Denizard-Thompson, Kathryn E Weaver, L Doug Case, Jennifer L Troyer, John G Spangler, Donna Lawler, and Michael P Pignone.
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (D.P.M., N.D., K.E.W., L.D.C., J.G.S., D.L.).
- Ann. Intern. Med. 2018 Apr 17; 168 (8): 550-557.
BackgroundScreening for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces mortality, yet more than one third of age-eligible Americans are unscreened.ObjectiveTo examine the effect of a digital health intervention, Mobile Patient Technology for Health-CRC (mPATH-CRC), on rates of CRC screening.DesignRandomized clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02088333).Setting6 community-based primary care practices.Participants450 patients (223 in the mPATH-CRC group and 227 in usual care) scheduled for a primary care visit and due for routine CRC screening.InterventionAn iPad application that displays a CRC screening decision aid, lets patients order their own screening tests, and sends automated follow-up electronic messages to support patients.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was chart-verified completion of CRC screening within 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were ability to state a screening preference, intention to receive screening, screening discussions, and orders for screening tests. All outcome assessors were blinded to randomization.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar between groups; 37% of participants had limited health literacy, and 53% had annual incomes less than $20 000. Screening was completed by 30% of mPATH-CRC participants and 15% of those receiving usual care (logistic regression odds ratio, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.6 to 4.0]). Compared with usual care, more mPATH-CRC participants could state a screening preference, planned to be screened within 6 months, discussed screening with their provider, and had a screening test ordered. Half of mPATH-CRC participants (53%; 118 of 223) "self-ordered" a test via the program.LimitationParticipants were English speakers in a single health care system.ConclusionA digital health intervention that allows patients to self-order tests can increase CRC screening. Future research should identify methods for implementing similar interventions in clinical care.Primary Funding SourceNational Cancer Institute.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.