• Br J Surg · Aug 2004

    Review

    Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate.

    • G G Jamieson, G Mathew, R Ludemann, J Wayman, J C Myers, and P G Devitt.
    • Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. chris.batesbrownsword@adelaide.edu.au
    • Br J Surg. 2004 Aug 1; 91 (8): 943-7.

    BackgroundThere have been three previous reviews of the world literature describing postoperative mortality rate following oesophagectomy. The first documented rates in the first half of the last century, the second the period 1960-1979 and the third the interval 1980-1988. The aim of this review was to document the rate for the period 1990-2000.MethodsReports were sourced through PubMed and/or Medline listings.ResultsThe number of papers included in the review was 312, involving 70,756 patients. The overall mortality rate was 6.7 per cent. The 30-day mortality rate was 4.9 per cent and the in-hospital mortality rate 8.8 per cent. Survival rates, where reported, were 62.7 per cent at 1 year and 27.9 per cent at 5 years.ConclusionOperative mortality rates following oesophagectomy have continued to fall. However, the true rate is almost certainly higher than that reported here, for a variety of reasons. The 1-year survival of patients was only reported in about a quarter of the papers. It may be a more meaningful figure than postoperative mortality rate.Copyright 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…