• Gail Ewing, Margaret Rogers, Stephen Barclay, Janet McCabe, Anna Martin, Malcolm Campbell, and Chris Todd.
• Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RF, UK. ge200@cam.ac.uk
• Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Jan 1; 56 (522): 273427-34.

BackgroundDifficulties in managing symptoms of palliative care patients at home have been identified, yet there has been no investigation of agreement on symptom assessment in primary care. Lack of agreement between patients' and primary care professionals' symptom assessments may be contributing to difficulties in symptom control.AimTo investigate agreement on symptom assessments between patients at home and GPs and district nurses.Design Of StudyProspective, self-completed, structured symptom assessments.SettingRoutine contacts with adult palliative care patients estimated to be in their last year of life.MethodPatient and professional symptom assessments were obtained using CAMPAS-R, a comprehensive and reliable measure validated for palliative care in the community. Prevalence of reported symptoms was calculated in patient-professional pairs. Intraclass correlation techniques (ICCs) and percentage agreement were used to determine how well symptom assessments of patients and professionals agreed.ResultsAnxiety and depression were significantly more likely to be reported by professionals, and GPs over-identified nausea, vomiting and constipation. Professionals assessed emotional symptoms as more severe than patients. Agreement on scoring of physical symptoms was better, although this was at least partially due to agreement on absence of symptoms. Unlike previous reports, pain scores recorded by doctors in this study, were not significantly different from patients.ConclusionThis quick and easy to complete assessment tool, CAMPAS-R, has potential for monitoring quality of palliative care symptom control at home.

22 keywords...

hide…