-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effects of dabigatran versus warfarin on 2-year cognitive outcomes in old patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the GIRAF randomized clinical trial.
- Bruno Caramelli, Pai Ching Yu, Francisco A M Cardozo, Iuri R Magalhães, Raphael R Spera, Daniel K Amado, Maria C Escalante-Rojas, Danielle M Gualandro, Daniela Calderaro, TavaresCaio A MCAMInstituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil., Flavio A Borges-Junior, Adriana F Pastana, Mariana G Matheus, BruckiSonia M DSMDGrupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil., Ana Carolina O Rodrigues, Ricardo Nitrini, and Paulo Caramelli.
- Unidade de Medicina Interdisciplinar em Cardiologia, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas C de Aguiar 44, São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil. bcaramel@usp.br.
- Bmc Med. 2022 Oct 26; 20 (1): 374.
BackgroundObservational studies support a role for oral anticoagulation to reduce the risk of dementia in atrial fibrillation patients, but conclusive data are lacking. Since dabigatran offers a more stable anticoagulation, we hypothesized it would reduce cognitive decline when compared to warfarin in old patients with atrial fibrillation.MethodsThe GIRAF trial was a 24-month, randomized, parallel-group, controlled, open-label, hypothesis generating trial. The trial was done in six centers including a geriatric care unit, secondary and tertiary care cardiology hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil. We included patients aged ≥ 70 years and CHA2DS2-VASc score > 1. The primary endpoint was the absolute difference in cognitive performance at 2 years. Patients were assigned 1:1 to take dabigatran (110 or 150 mg twice daily) or warfarin, controlled by INR and followed for 24 months. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 2 years with a comprehensive and thorough cognitive evaluation protocol of tests for different cognitive domains including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), a composite neuropsychological test battery (NTB), and computer-generated tests (CGNT).ResultsBetween 2014 and 2019, 5523 participants were screened and 200 were assigned to dabigatran (N = 99) or warfarin (N = 101) treatment. After adjustment for age, log of years of education, and raw baseline score, the difference between the mean change from baseline in the dabigatran group minus warfarin group was - 0.12 for MMSE (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.88 to 0.63; P = 0.75), 0.05 (95% CI - 0.07 to 0.18; P = 0.40) for NTB, - 0.15 (95% CI - 0.30 to 0.01; P = 0.06) for CGNT, and - 0.96 (95% CI - 1.80 to 0.13; P = 0.02) for MoCA, with higher values suggesting less cognitive decline in the warfarin group.ConclusionsFor elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, and without cognitive compromise at baseline that did not have stroke and were adequately treated with warfarin (TTR of 70%) or dabigatran for 2 years, there was no statistical difference at 5% significance level in any of the cognitive outcomes after adjusting for multiple comparisons.Trial RegistrationCognitive Impairment Related to Atrial Fibrillation Prevention Trial (GIRAF), NCT01994265 .© 2022. The Author(s).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.