• Br J Surg · May 2001

    Revisiting transtibial amputation with the long posterior flap.

    • P A Allcock and A S Jain.
    • Department of Orthopaedics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. paul.allcock@virgin.net
    • Br J Surg. 2001 May 1; 88 (5): 683686683-6.

    BackgroundThe long posterior flap has been the procedure of choice for transtibial amputation for many years, but recently its theoretical basis has been challenged. This study assessed the results with the long posterior flap for leg amputation.MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed. All patients who were referred to the Dundee Limb Fitting Centre for leg amputation between 1987 and 1996 had details of diagnosis, investigations, procedure, and both operative and functional outcome recorded contemporaneously.ResultsSome 126 patients required a transfemoral amputation and 445 needed a transtibial procedure. Fifty patients having the transtibial operation, who would otherwise have required a transfemoral amputation, had a medially based flap; the remaining 395 patients underwent a transtibial amputation by the long posterior flap technique. Primary healing was achieved in 317 patients, and 11 amputations healed by secondary intention. Fifty-one patients required a local wedge resection and 16 had a secondary transfemoral amputation.ConclusionThese results compare favourably with those of other published series. The long posterior flap remains to be bettered for routine transtibial amputation.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…