• Medicina · Jan 2002

    Comparative Study

    [Knee joint evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament plasty].

    • Linas Vitkus, Markas Fiodorovas, and Gintautas Pocius.
    • Kauno medicinos universiteto Ortopedijos ir traumatologijos klinika, Laisves al. 17, 3000 Kaunas.
    • Medicina (Kaunas). 2002 Jan 1; 38 (5): 510514510-4.

    Aim Of The StudyTo make certain how the patients themselves evaluate the state of their knee joint and check-up the state objectively after 3, 6, 12 months period after the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Materials And MethodsIn 1996-2001 there were performed 78 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction operations. Twenty one patient was chosen. The patients were questioned according to subjective IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) form, 12 months after the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. To have an objective evaluation, the patients had to come to the control check-up in 3, 6 and 12 months after the operation. During the clinical check-up the objective IKDC form was being used.ResultsAccording to subjective IKDC formula: for six patients (29%) the results were very good; for seven patients (33%)--good; for seven patients (33%)--satisfactory; for one patient (5%)--bad. The objective data showed that the state of the knee joint before the operation was bad or satisfactory. Now to 90% of the patients the state of the knee joint is very good; 10% evaluate it as good. For all patients (100%) the instability of the knee joint disappeared.ConclusionsFor all questioned patients the instability of the knee joint after the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction disappeared; 95% patients are satisfied with the results of the operation.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…