• Niteesh K Choudhry, Sheila Fifer, Constance P Fontanet, Kristin R Archer, Ellen Sears, Gauri Bhatkhande, Nancy Haff, Roya Ghazinouri, Rogelio A Coronado, Byron J Schneider, Susan W Butterworth, Harvinder Deogun, Angelina Cooper, Eugene Hsu, Shannon Block, Claudia A Davidson, Claude E Shackelford, Parul Goyal, Arnold Milstein, SPINE CARE Investigators, Katherine Crum, Jennifer Scott, Keith Marton, Flavio M Silva, Sarah Obeidalla, Payton E Robinette, Mario Lorenzana-DeWitt, Courtney A Bair, Hana J Sadun, Natalie Goldfield, Luke M Hogewood, Emma K Sterling, Cole Pickney, Emma J Koltun-Baker, Andrew Swehla, Vishvaas Ravikumar, Sameeksha Malhotra, Sabrina T Finney, Lynn Holliday, Karin C Moolman, Shanita Coleman-Dockery, Ilaben B Patel, Federica B Angel, Jennifer K Green, Kevin Mitchell, Mary R McBean, Muteeb Ghaffar, Sandra R Ermini, Ana L Carr, and James MacDonald.
• Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
• JAMA. 2022 Dec 20; 328 (23): 233423442334-2344.

ImportanceLow back and neck pain are often self-limited, but health care spending remains high.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of 2 interventions that emphasize noninvasive care for spine pain.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsPragmatic, cluster, randomized clinical trial conducted at 33 centers in the US that enrolled 2971 participants with neck or back pain of 3 months' duration or less (enrollment, June 2017 to March 2020; final follow-up, March 2021).InterventionsParticipants were randomized at the clinic-level to (1) usual care (n = 992); (2) a risk-stratified, multidisciplinary intervention (the identify, coordinate, and enhance [ICE] care model that combines physical therapy, health coach counseling, and consultation from a specialist in pain medicine or rehabilitation) (n = 829); or (3) individualized postural therapy (IPT), a postural therapy approach that combines physical therapy with building self-efficacy and self-management (n = 1150).Main Outcomes And MeasuresThe primary outcomes were change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 3 months (range, 0 [best] to 100 [worst]; minimal clinically important difference, 6) and spine-related health care spending at 1 year. A 2-sided significance threshold of .025 was used to define statistical significance.ResultsAmong 2971 participants randomized (mean age, 51.7 years; 1792 women [60.3%]), 2733 (92%) finished the trial. Between baseline and 3-month follow-up, mean ODI scores changed from 31.2 to 15.4 for ICE, from 29.3 to 15.4 for IPT, and from 28.9 to 19.5 for usual care. At 3-month follow-up, absolute differences compared with usual care were -5.8 (95% CI, -7.7 to -3.9; P < .001) for ICE and -4.3 (95% CI, -5.9 to -2.6; P < .001) for IPT. Mean 12-month spending was $1448, $2528, and $1587 in the ICE, IPT, and usual care groups, respectively. Differences in spending compared with usual care were -$139 (risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.997]; P = .04) for ICE and $941 (risk ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.35 to 1.45]; P < .001) for IPT.Conclusions And RelevanceAmong patients with acute or subacute spine pain, a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial intervention or an individualized postural therapy intervention, each compared with usual care, resulted in small but statistically significant reductions in pain-related disability at 3 months. However, compared with usual care, the biopsychosocial intervention resulted in no significant difference in spine-related health care spending and the postural therapy intervention resulted in significantly greater spine-related health care spending at 1 year.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03083886.

22 keywords...

hide…