• Hua Li, Daofeng Wang, Wupeng Zhang, Gaoxiang Xu, Cheng Xu, Hao Zhang, Licheng Zhang, Jiantao Li, and Peifu Tang.
• Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100048, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China.
• Injury. 2023 Apr 1; 54 (4): 104710541047-1054.

IntroductionIntramedullary nailing (IMN) is a general treatment for intertrochanteric hip fractures. The computer-assisted orthopaedics system (CAOS), ADAPT system (Stryker, NJ), has been developed to facilitate lag screw insertion. When compared to the conventional freehand method, the efficacy of CAOS has not been clearly clarified. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to answer: does the CAOS performed better than freehand method in IMN.Materials And MethodsStudies published up to January 2023 were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases with predetermined key words. Comparative clinical studies between CAOS (ADAPT system) and freehand method were included. The primary outcomes of interest were the tip-apex-distance (TAD) and positions of lag screw. Fluoroscopy use, operation duration and intraoperative/postoperative complications were also extracted. A meta-analysis was performed for pooled analysis.ResultsThere were seven studies with 326 fractures in CAOS group and 325 fractures in Freehand group. All studies included presented high qualities. The CAOS group showed a statistically smaller TAD than Freehand group (weighted mean difference = -3.24 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.10 to -1.37 mm; p = 0.0007) and a better lag screw position (83/92 [90.2%] VS 64/92 [69.6%]; RR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.51; p = 0.0007). The operative time and radiation use revealed no difference between two groups.ConclusionsThe current evidence indicated that ADAPT system could help to perform a more accurate lag screw than freehand manipulation while the operative time and radiation time was not reduced as expectations on such new technique. Long-term follow-up studies are appealed.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…