• Maria C Inacio, Tesfahun C Eshetie, Gillian E Caughey, Craig Whitehead, Johanna Westbrook, Len Gray, Peter Hibbert, Elizabeth Beattie, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Ian D Cameron, Maria Crotty, and Steve Wesselingh.
• Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
• Intern Med J. 2023 Nov 1; 53 (11): 207320782073-2078.

BackgroundIn Australia, 243 000 individuals live in approximately 2700 residential aged care facilities yearly. In 2019, a National Aged Care Mandatory Quality Indicator programme (QI programme) was implemented to monitor the quality and safety of care in facilities.AimTo examine the validity of the QI programme indicators using explicit measure review criteria.MethodsThe QI programme manual and reports were reviewed. A modified American College of Physicians Measure Review Criteria was employed to examine the QI programme's eight indicators. Five authors rated each indicator on importance, appropriateness, clinical evidence, specifications and feasibility using a nine-point scale. A median score of 1-3 was considered to not meet criteria, 4-6 to meet some criteria and 7-9 to meet criteria.ResultsAll indicators, except polypharmacy, met criteria (median scores = 7-9) for importance, appropriateness and clinical evidence. Polypharmacy met some criteria for importance (median = 6, range 2-8), appropriateness (median = 5, range 2-8) and clinical evidence (median = 6, range 3-8). Pressure injury, physical restraints, significant unplanned weight loss, consecutive unplanned weight loss, falls and polypharmacy indicators met some criteria for specifications validity (all median scores = 5) and feasibility and applicability (median scores = 4 to 6). Antipsychotic use and falls resulting in major injury met some criteria for specifications (median = 6-7, range 4-8) and met criteria for feasibility and applicability (median = 7, range 4-8).ConclusionsAustralia's National QI programme is a major stride towards a culture of quality promotion, improvement and transparency. Measures' specifications, feasibility and applicability could be improved to ensure the programme delivers on its intended purposes.© 2023 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

18 keywords...

hide…