• Lancet · Nov 2022

    Review

    Investigating the implementation of mobile messaging in population screening programmes: a modified Delphi study.

    • Amish Acharya, Gaby Judah, Hutan Ashrafian, Viknesh Sounderajah, Nick Johnstone-Waddell, Mike Harris, Anne Stevenson, and Ara Darzi.
    • Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: aa2107@ic.ac.uk.
    • Lancet. 2022 Nov 1; 400 Suppl 1: S15S15.

    BackgroundMobile messaging is an increasingly important health-care communication tool. Screening programmes pose unique challenges because of the large, diverse populations invited, who might have not interacted with services previously. This study aimed to provide guidance on how screening programmes in England can effectively implement mobile messaging services.MethodsExperts based in England, from public health, policy, screening provision, communications, and academia were recruited to this Delphi study. Recommendations were derived from an evidence synthesis involving a literature review, expert scoping questionnaire, public consultation, and discussion with relevant national organisations. Experts voted upon the importance and feasibility of recommendations across two consensus rounds, using a five-point Likert scale. Items reaching consensus, defined a priori at 70%, on importance and feasibility formed core recommendations. Those reaching this threshold on importance only, were labelled desirable. All items were discussed at an expert meeting to determine suitability. Ethical approval was obtained (20IC6088), and participants provided informed consent.Findings33 experts representing all 11 screening programmes were enrolled, with 100% retention across rounds. Of the initial 101 items, 23 (23%) reached consensus. These core recommendations were divided across six domains: message content, timing, delivery, evaluation, security, and research. They included the use of general practitioner endorsement and limiting message length to 320 characters. A further 17 items were considered desirable; for example, introducing greater functionality such as bidirectional and tailored messaging.InterpretationFindings will facilitate the effective use of mobile messaging across screening and will form national guidance for services. This guidance will enable programmes to overcome implementation challenges and facilitate uptake of screening invitations. As representation of experts was skewed toward cancer versus non-cancer screening programmes, the generalisability of these findings must be carefully considered. However, the list of desirable items provides areas for future consideration for all programmes, as technological innovation in messaging grows.FundingNational Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…