• Lancet · Nov 2022

    Smoking cessation interventions for smokers diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review.

    • Kate Frazer, Nancy Bhardwaj, Patricia Fox, Vikram Niranjan, Diarmuid Stokes, Seamus Quinn, Cecily C Kelleher, and Patricia Fitzpatrick.
    • University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: kathleen.frazer@ucd.ie.
    • Lancet. 2022 Nov 1; 400 Suppl 1: S39S39.

    BackgroundSmoking continuation or uptake after a diagnosis of cancer is associated with decreased treatment efficacy, health deterioration, and worse survival outcomes; nonetheless, many patients with cancer continue smoking after their diagnosis. The extent and effectiveness of smoking cessation services in this cohort is poorly understood, but engagement with smoking cessation services is known to be scarce. The aim of this systematic review was to identify interventions for smokers diagnosed with cancer, as part of a larger study to develop a quit pathway.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database for articles published between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 15, 2020, in English, reporting an intervention for smokers aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of lung, breast, cervical, or head and neck cancer (smoking-related cancers), and with no restriction on study design. Outcomes included intervention descriptions and quit rates. Data were independently screened, extracted, and assessed for quality. This systematic review is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (number CRD42020214204).Findings4293 unique records were found, of which 23 studies (nine randomised controlled trials, ten observational studies, three quality improvement studies, and one qualitative study met the inclusion criteria. Studies included between 11 and 2652 participants. 17 (74%) studies reported data from the USA, with the remainder 6 (26%) reporting data from Canada, Australia, Lebanon, and England. Ten (43%) studies reported data from head and neck cancer, three (13%) from lung cancer, one (4%) for breast cancer, and the remaining nine studies (39%) reported combined data for multiple cancers. Duration of smoking cessation interventions ranged between 1 month and 24 months. The heterogeneity of the data prompted a narrative synthesis. Key smoking cessation interventions included long-term use of pharmacotherapy, high tech e-referral systems, national quitting programmes, quitting apps, enhanced counselling, and an opt-out referral system. Four randomised controlled trials and four observational studies reported sustained quit attempts. Factors associated with quitting included timing and frequency of quitting conversations (pre-operatively), extended use of varenicline (up to 24 weeks), and counselling. Patient challenges included pain, fatigue, guilt, and lack of confidence.InterpretationA multifaceted approach including personalised treatment plans is needed to promote smoking cessation in patients with cancer.FundingIrish Cancer Society (grant SCA19FIT).Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…