• L Holmstrom, H Chugh, A Uy-Evanado, A Salvucci, J Jui, K Reinier, and S S Chugh.
• Center for Cardiac Arrest Prevention, Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
• Resuscitation. 2023 Jun 1; 187: 109798109798.

ObjectiveThe proportion of sudden cardiac arrests (SCA) manifesting with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) has increased significantly, and the survival rate remains lower than ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, a subgroup of PEA-SCA cases does survive and may yield key predictors of improved outcomes when compared to non-survivors. We aimed to identify key predictors of survival from PEA-SCA.MethodsOur study sample is drawn from two ongoing community-based, prospective studies of out-of-hospital SCA: Oregon SUDS from the Portland, OR metro area (Pop. approx. 1 million; 2002-2017) and Ventura PRESTO from Ventura County, CA (Pop. approx. 850,000, 2015-2021). For the present sub-study, we included SCA cases with PEA as the presenting rhythm where emergency medical services (EMS) personnel attempted resuscitation.ResultsWe identified 1,704 PEA-SCA cases, of which 173 (10.2%) were survivors and 1,531 (89.8%) non-survivors. Patients whose PEA-SCA occurred in a healthcare unit (16.9%) or public location (18.1%) had higher survival than those whose PEA-SCA occurred at home (9.3%) or in a care facility (5.7%). Young age, witness status, PEA-SCA location and pre-existing COPD/asthma were independent predictors of survival. Among witnessed cases the survival rate was 10% even if EMS response time was >10 minutes.ConclusionsKey determinants for survival from PEA-SCA were young age, witnessed status, public location and pre-existing COPD/asthma. Survival outcomes in witnessed PEA cases were better than expected, even with delayed EMS response.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…