• J. Investig. Med. · Aug 2023

    Framingham risk score conventional risk factors are potent to predict all-cause mortality using machine learning algorithms: a population-based prospective cohort study over 40 years in China.

    • QianQian Huang, TianShu Zeng, JiaoYue Zhang, Jie Min, Juan Zheng, ShengHua Tian, Hantao Huang, XiaoHuan Liu, Hao Zhang, Ping Wang, Xiang Hu, and LuLu Chen.
    • Union Hospital, Department of Endocrinology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
    • J. Investig. Med. 2023 Aug 1; 71 (6): 586590586-590.

    AbstractPredicting all-cause mortality using available or conveniently modifiable risk factors is potentially crucial in reducing deaths precisely and efficiently. Framingham risk score (FRS) is widely used in predicting cardiovascular diseases, and its conventional risk factors are closely pertinent to deaths. Machine learning is increasingly considered to improve the predicting performances by developing predictive models. We aimed to develop the all-cause mortality predictive models using five machine learning (ML) algorithms (decision trees, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), XgBoost, and logistic regression) and determine whether FRS conventional risk factors are sufficient for predicting all-cause mortality in individuals over 40 years. Our data were obtained from a 10-year population-based prospective cohort study in China, including 9143 individuals over 40 years in 2011, and 6879 individuals followed-up in 2021. The all-cause mortality prediction models were developed using five ML algorithms by introducing all features available (182 items) or FRS conventional risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of the predictive models. The AUC and 95% confidence interval of the all-cause mortality prediction models developed by FRS conventional risk factors using five ML algorithms were 0.75 (0.726-0.772), 0.78 (0.755-0.799), 0.75 (0.731-0.777), 0.77 (0.747-0.792), and 0.78 (0.754-0.798), respectively, which is close to the AUC values of models established by all features (0.79 (0.769-0.812), 0.83 (0.807-0.848), 0.78 (0.753-0.798), 0.82 (0.796-0.838), and 0.85 (0.826-0.866), respectively). Therefore, we tentatively put forward that FRS conventional risk factors were potent to predict all-cause mortality using machine learning algorithms in the population over 40 years.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…