• HarrisAlex H SAHS0000-0001-7267-3077Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Alexander.Harris2@va.gov.Stanford -Surgical Policy Improvement Research and Education Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford, Andrea K Finlay, Hildi J Hagedorn, Luisa Manfredi, Gabrielle Jones, Robin N Kamal, Erika D Sears, Mary Hawn, Dan Eisenberg, Suzann Pershing, and Seshadri Mudumbai.
• Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Alexander.Harris2@va.gov.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov 1; 38 (14): 320932153209-3215.

BackgroundHealthcare agencies and perioperative professional organizations recommend avoiding preoperative screening tests for low-risk surgical procedures. However, low-value preoperative tests are still commonly ordered even for generally healthy patients and active strategies to reduce this testing have not been adequately described.ObjectiveWe sought to learn from hospitals with either high levels of testing or that had recently reduced use of low-value screening tests (aka "delta sites") about reasons for testing and active deimplementation strategies they used to effectively improve practice.DesignQualitative study of semi-structured telephone interviews.ParticipantsWe identified facilities in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) with high or recently improved burden of potentially low-value preoperative testing for carpal tunnel release and cataract surgery. We recruited perioperative clinicians to participate.ApproachQuestions focused on reasons to order preoperative screening tests for patients undergoing low-risk surgery and, more importantly, what strategies had been successfully used to reduce testing. A framework method was used to identify common improvement strategies and specific care delivery innovations.Key ResultsThirty-five perioperative clinicians (e.g., hand surgeons, ophthalmologists, anesthesiologists, primary care providers, directors of preoperative clinics, nurses) from 29 VHA facilities participated. Facilities that successfully reduced the burden of low-value testing shared many improvement strategies (e.g., building consensus among stakeholders; using evidence/norm-based education and persuasion; clarifying responsibility for ordering tests) to implement different care delivery innovations (e.g., pre-screening to decide if a preop clinic evaluation is necessary; establishing a dedicated preop clinic for low-risk procedures).ConclusionsWe identified a menu of common improvement strategies and specific care delivery innovations that might be helpful for institutions trying to design their own quality improvement programs to reduce low-value preoperative testing given their unique structure, resources, and constraints.© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

10 keywords...

hide…