• Chest · Jan 2024

    The SGS-6: A Novel QOL Survey Validated to Predict Need for Intervention in Patients with Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis.

    • Richard J Lu, Baraa Hijaz, Matthew R Naunheim, Lily Stevenson, and Ramon A Franco.
    • Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
    • Chest. 2024 Jan 1; 165 (1): 161171161-171.

    BackgroundIdiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) is a recurrent, chronic disease defined by fibroinflammatory narrowing of the subglottic airway. A key challenge in treatment is monitoring disease progression, which may be debilitating and unpredictable in its timing.Research QuestionCan the Subglottic Stenosis 6 (SGS-6) questionnaire be validated as a novel quality-of-life (QOL) instrument to monitor breathing, disease progression, and disease severity proactively in patients with iSGS?Study Design And MethodsPanel data from 51 patients with iSGS were collected from January 2012 through June 2022, representing 1,684 patient encounters including routine office visits and treatment encounters. Subjective QOL scores (including the novel SGS-6 and established RAND-36 and EuroQol Five Dimensions [EQ-5D] Visual Analog Scale) and objective pulmonary function test (PFT) results were collected at each visit. Subjective SGS-6 QOL scores were repeated within 1 week of initial reporting. Panel regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between SGS-6 scores, PFT results, and a patient's need for intervention. Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for SGS-6 and peak expiratory flow percentage (PEF%) were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and a patient's need for intervention as the external anchor.ResultsEach one-point increase in SGS-6 score (of a maximum of 27) was associated with a 3.26% decrease in PEF%, a 1.93-point decrease in RAND-36 Physical Health composite score, a 1.27-point decrease in RAND-36 Mental Health composite score, and a 0.88-point decrease in EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale score. The intracorrelation coefficient for the SGS-6 composite score is 0.838 (95% CI, 0.770-0.888). Compared with patient baselines, SGS-6 scores were 4.66 points greater at the time of intervention with an MCID of 2.25 from a patient's baseline. The area under the ROC curve for SGS-6 and a patient's intervention point was 0.81.InterpretationiSGS disease severity can be modeled using the SGS-6 questionnaire, offering physicians and patients a potentially new method of tracking disease progression and need for intervention remotely.Copyright © 2023 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…