• Stéphanie Lallier, Christelle Hourantier, Julie Gilles de la Londe, Grégoire Billon, Jean-Sébastien Cadwallader, and Marie-Aude Piot.
• Department of Medical Practice, Université de Paris-Cité, Epernon, Paris, France.
• Fam Pract. 2023 Nov 23; 40 (4): 575581575-581.

BackgroundEmpathetic listening can be particularly challenging with patients presenting pressured speech, while time pressure and costs limit practitioners' availability. We aimed to explore general practitioners' (GPs') experiences when encountering a patient with pressured speech without pathological syndrome.MethodsUsing a thematic analysis method, 19 semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs purposively sampled in Ile-de-France region.ResultsThree themes emerged. First, misgivings were aroused when meeting a patient with pressured speech, including frustration, displeasure, and a struggle to maintain focus. Second, huge efforts were needed to adhere to the appropriate clinical reasoning and care for these patients who need more time and energy. The very definition of this condition varies from one clinician to another, and for some, psychiatric conditions were systematically associated. Third, implementation of specific strategies was required to adjust to these patients: trying to create distance with the patient, to organize a framework in which the patient with pressured speech can express him or herself, and even strategies to increase GPs' availability.ConclusionThe time and energy required to provide adequate care for patients presenting with pressured speech make it quite challenging, and this builds up pressure in the waiting room. But when medical demands take this form, there is a risk that clinicians will reject the patient or refer early to mental health services, leading to growing feelings of abandonment, the neglect of organic issues, and medical nomadism. Initial and continuing medical training focussing on advanced communication skills and multifocal approaches can foster long-term follow-up.© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

14 keywords...

hide…