• Eur J Emerg Med · Apr 2024

    Association between mortality and phone-line waiting time for non-urgent medical care: a Danish registry-based cohort study.

    • Elisabeth Helen Anna Mills, Amalie Lykkemark Møller, Filip Gnesin, Nertila Zylyftari, Britta Jensen, ChristensenHelle CollatzHCCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, Copenhagen and University of Copenhagen.Danish Clinical Quality Program - National Clinical Registries (RKKP), Righospitalet, Copenhagen., Stig Nikolaj Blomberg, Kristian Hay Kragholm, Gunnar Gislason, Lars Køber, Thomas Gerds, Fredrik Folke, Freddy Lippert, Christian Torp-Pedersen, and Mikkel Porsborg Andersen.
    • Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg.
    • Eur J Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 1; 31 (2): 127135127-135.

    Background And ImportanceTelephone calls are often patients' first healthcare service contact, outcomes associated with waiting times are unknown.ObjectivesExamine the association between waiting time to answer for a medical helpline and 1- and 30-day mortality.Design, Setting And ParticipantsRegistry-based cohort study using phone calls data (January 2014 to December 2018) to the Capital Region of Denmark's medical helpline. The service refers to hospital assessment/treatment, dispatches ambulances, or suggests self-care guidance.ExposureWaiting time was grouped into the following time intervals in accordance with political service targets for waiting time in the Capital Region: <30 s, 0:30-2:59, 3-9:59, and ≥10 min.Outcome Measures And AnalysisThe association between time intervals and 1- and 30-day mortality per call was calculated using logistic regression with strata defined by age and sex.Main ResultsIn total, 1 244 252 callers were included, phoning 3 956 243 times, and 78% of calls waited <10 min. Among callers, 30-day mortality was 1% (16 560 deaths). For calls by females aged 85-110 30-day mortality increased with longer waiting time, particularly within the first minute: 9.6% for waiting time <30 s, 10.8% between 30 s and 1 minute and 9.1% between 1 and 2 minutes. For calls by males aged 85-110 30-day mortality was 11.1%, 12.9% and 11.1%, respectively. Additionally, among calls with a Charlson score of 2 or higher, longer waiting times were likewise associated with increased mortality. For calls by females aged 85-110 30-day mortality was 11.6% for waiting time <30 s, 12.9% between 30 s and 1 minute and 11.2% between 1 and 2 minutes. For calls by males aged 85-110 30-day mortality was 12.7%, 14.1% and 12.6%, respectively. Fewer ambulances were dispatched with longer waiting times (4%/2%) with waiting times <30 s and >10 min.ConclusionLonger waiting times for telephone contact to a medical helpline were associated with increased 1- and 30-day mortality within the first minute, especially among elderly or more comorbid callers.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…