• Jessica Watson, Alexander Burrell, Polly Duncan, Ian Bennett-Britton, Sam Hodgson, Samuel Wd Merriel, Salman Waqar, Penny F Whiting, and Primary care Academic CollaboraTive.
• National Institute for Health and Care Research doctoral research fellow.
• Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Mar 1; 74 (740): e133e140e133-e140.

BackgroundRates of blood testing have increased over the past two decades. Reasons for testing cannot easily be extracted from electronic health record databases.AimTo explore who requests blood tests and why, and what the outcomes of testing are in UK primary care.Design And SettingA retrospective audit of electronic health records in general practices in England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland was undertaken.MethodFifty-seven clinicians from the Primary care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT) each reviewed the electronic health records of 50 patients who had blood tests in April 2021. Anonymised data were extracted including patient characteristics, who requested the tests, reasons for testing, test results, and outcomes of testing.ResultsData were collected from 2572 patients across 57 GP practices. The commonest reasons for testing in primary care were investigation of symptoms (43.2%), monitoring of existing disease (30.1%), monitoring of existing medications (10.1%), and follow up of previous abnormalities (6.8%); patient requested testing was rare in this study (1.5%). Abnormal and borderline results were common, with 26.6% of patients having completely normal test results. Around one-quarter of tests were thought to be partially or fully unnecessary when reviewed retrospectively by a clinical colleague. Overall, 6.2% of tests in primary care led to a new diagnosis or confirmation of a diagnosis.ConclusionThe utilisation of a national collaborative model (PACT) has enabled a unique exploration of the rationale and outcomes of blood testing in primary care, highlighting areas for future research and optimisation.© The Authors.

20 keywords...

hide…