• N. Engl. J. Med. · Oct 2023

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Esketamine Nasal Spray versus Quetiapine for Treatment-Resistant Depression.

    • Andreas Reif, Istvan Bitter, Jozefien Buyze, Kerstin Cebulla, Richard Frey, Dong-Jing Fu, Tetsuro Ito, Yerkebulan Kambarov, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Albino J Oliveira-Maia, Thomas Messer, Siobhán Mulhern-Haughey, Benoît Rive, Christian von Holt, Allan H Young, Yordan Godinov, and ESCAPE-TRD Investigators.
    • From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.).
    • N. Engl. J. Med. 2023 Oct 5; 389 (14): 129813091298-1309.

    BackgroundIn treatment-resistant depression, commonly defined as a lack of response to two or more consecutive treatments during the current depressive episode, the percentage of patients with remission is low and the percentage with relapse is high. The efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray as compared with extended-release quetiapine augmentation therapy, both in combination with ongoing treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), in patients with treatment-resistant depression are unknown.MethodsIn an open-label, single-blind (with raters unaware of group assignments), multicenter, phase 3b, randomized, active-controlled trial, we assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive flexible doses (according to the summary of product characteristics) of esketamine nasal spray (esketamine group) or extended-release quetiapine (quetiapine group), both in combination with an SSRI or SNRI. The primary end point was remission, defined as a score of 10 or less on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), at week 8 (scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression). The key secondary end point was no relapse through week 32 after remission at week 8. All patients were included in the analysis; patients who discontinued the trial treatment were considered as having had an unfavorable outcome (i.e., they were grouped with patients who did not have remission or who had a relapse). Analyses of the primary and key secondary end points were adjusted for age and number of treatment failures.ResultsOverall, 336 patients were assigned to the esketamine group and 340 to the quetiapine group. More patients in the esketamine group than in the quetiapine group had remission at week 8 (91 of 336 patients [27.1%] vs. 60 of 340 patients [17.6%]; P = 0.003) and had no relapse through week 32 after remission at week 8 (73 of 336 patients [21.7%] vs. 48 of 340 patients [14.1%]). Over 32 weeks of follow-up, the percentage of patients with remission, the percentage of patients with a treatment response, and the change in the MADRS score from baseline favored esketamine nasal spray. The adverse events were consistent with the established safety profiles of the trial treatments.ConclusionsIn patients with treatment-resistant depression, esketamine nasal spray plus an SSRI or SNRI was superior to extended-release quetiapine plus an SSRI or SNRI with respect to remission at week 8. (Funded by Janssen EMEA; ESCAPE-TRD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04338321.).Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…