• Zixuan Yao, Yuansen Chen, Duo Li, Yongnan Li, Yanqing Liu, and Haojun Fan.
• Department of Cardiac Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
• Shock. 2024 Apr 1; 61 (4): 509519509-519.

AbstractHemorrhagic shock (HS) is a common complication after traumatic injury. Early identification of HS can reduce patients' risk of death. Currently, the identification of HS relies on macrocirculation indicators such as systolic blood pressure and heart rate, which are easily affected by the body's compensatory functions. Recently, the independence of the body's overall macrocirculation from microcirculation has been demonstrated, and microcirculation indicators have been widely used in the evaluation of HS. In this study, we reviewed the progress of research in the literature on the use of microcirculation metrics to monitor shock. We analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of each metric and found that microcirculation monitoring could not only indicate changes in tissue perfusion before changes in macrocirculation occurred but also correct tissue perfusion and cell oxygenation after the macrocirculation index returned to normal following fluid resuscitation, which is conducive to the early prediction and prognosis of HS. However, microcirculation monitoring is greatly affected by individual differences and environmental factors. Therefore, the current limitations of microcirculation assessments mean that they should be incorporated as part of an overall assessment of HS patients. Future research should explore how to better combine microcirculation and macrocirculation monitoring for the early identification and prognosis of HS patients.Copyright © 2023 by the Shock Society.

28 keywords...

hide…