• Jennifer A Hall, Kira Wilkinson, Claire Haddon, and Geraldine Barrett.
• UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, Reproductive Health Research Department, Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Team, London, United Kingdom.
• Fam Pract. 2024 Apr 15; 41 (2): 131138131-138.

BackgroundFor health services to help people plan for or prevent pregnancy, health professionals need an acceptable way to identify individuals' preferences.ObjectiveTo assess women's views on the acceptability of specific questions about pregnancy preferences when asked by health professionals in a variety of primary care contexts.MethodsOne-to-one in-depth interviews with 13 women aged 18-48 from across the UK, involving role-play scenarios and ranking exercises. Interviews covered a range of settings and health professionals, different question wording, and ways of asking (in person or digitally). We conducted a thematic Framework Analysis, focussing on themes relating to feelings and preferences.ResultsWomen were generally open to being asked about pregnancy preferences if they understood the rationale, it was asked in a relevant context, such as in women's health-related consultations, and there was follow-up. After signposting, an open question, such as 'How would you feel about having a baby in the next year?' was preferred in a face-to-face context as it enabled discussion. While some women valued a face-to-face discussion with a health professional, for others the privacy and convenience of a digital option was preferred; methods should be tailored to the target population.ConclusionDiscussion of pregnancy preferences via a range of formats is acceptable to, and valued by, women in the UK across a range of primary care settings. Acceptability to health professionals and feasibility of implementation needs further exploration and would benefit from greater public awareness of the benefits of pregnancy planning.© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.

14 keywords...

hide…