• Lucky Krog, Jillian Maloney, Scott Pew, Olufunmilola Adeleye, Brooks Johnson, Brett Glenn, Benjamin Gill, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Robert Pagan-Rosado, Madeline Whitney, Neil Sinha, and Natalie Strand.
• Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA. kirigo.lucky@mayo.edu.
• Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Apr 1; 28 (4): 239249239-249.

Purpose Of ReviewThis literature review critically examines existing studies on cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) for the treatment of chronic pain. The objective is to evaluate the current evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and collate data to inform clinical decision-making and suggest future research avenues. The review covers indications, contraindications, surgical and anesthetic approaches, trials, efficacy, and complications of cSCS.Recent FindingsRecent advancements highlight the evolving role of cSCS in chronic pain management. New neuromodulation techniques involve optimal placement of leads based on the pain's innervation level, maximizing therapeutic outcomes. Contemporary studies underscore the broadening benefits of cSCS, including enhanced functional abilities and sleep quality. However, alongside these innovations come challenges; emerging data bring attention to complications such as hardware issues and infections. Significantly, modern research emphasizes the crucial role of accurate patient selection, factoring in prior therapy responses and comprehensive evaluations. cSCS emerges as a promising tool for chronic pain management, with benefits beyond mere pain relief. As surgical techniques, patient selection criteria, and postoperative care refine, the potential of cSCS expands to benefit a broader patient demographic. However, further comprehensive research is necessary to enhance its application, validate its role earlier in treatment, and ultimately ameliorate the lives of those with chronic pain.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

11 keywords...

hide…