• Critical care medicine · May 2006

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    A randomized trial of intermittent lorazepam versus propofol with daily interruption in mechanically ventilated patients.

    • Shannon S Carson, John P Kress, Jo Ellen Rodgers, Ajeet Vinayak, Stacy Campbell-Bright, Joseph Levitt, Sharya Bourdet, Anastasia Ivanova, Ashley G Henderson, Anne Pohlman, Lydia Chang, Preston B Rich, and Jesse Hall.
    • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4134 Bioinformatics Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7020, USA. scarson@med.unc.edu
    • Crit. Care Med. 2006 May 1;34(5):1326-32.

    ObjectiveTo compare duration of mechanical ventilation for patients randomized to receive lorazepam by intermittent bolus administration vs. continuous infusions of propofol using protocols that include scheduled daily interruption of sedation.DesignA randomized open-label trial enrolling patients from October 2001 to March 2004.SettingMedical intensive care units of two tertiary care medical centers.PatientsAdult patients expected to require mechanical ventilation for >48 hrs and who required > or =10 mg of lorazepam or a continuous infusion of a sedative to achieve adequate sedation.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive lorazepam by intermittent bolus administration or propofol by continuous infusion to maintain a Ramsay score of 2-3. Sedation was interrupted on a daily basis for both groups.Measurements And Main ResultsThe primary outcome was median ventilator days. Secondary outcomes included 28-day ventilator-free survival, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and hospital mortality. Median ventilator days were significantly lower in the daily interruption propofol group compared with the intermittent bolus lorazepam group (5.8 vs. 8.4, p = .04). The difference was largest for hospital survivors (4.4 vs. 9.0, p = .006). There was a trend toward greater ventilator-free survival for patients in the daily interruption propofol group (median 18.5 days for propofol vs. 10.2 for lorazepam, p = .06). Hospital mortality was not different.ConclusionsFor medical patients requiring >48 hrs of mechanical ventilation, sedation with propofol results in significantly fewer ventilator days compared with intermittent lorazepam when sedatives are interrupted daily.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…