• Peter Langhorne, Martin Dennis, Lalit Kalra, Sasha Shepperd, Derick T Wade, and Charles D A Wolfe.
• Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, University of Glasgow, 3rd Floor, Centre Block, RoyalInfirmary, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK. p.langhorne@clinmed.gla.ac.uk.
• Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18; 1 (1): CD000444CD000444.

BackgroundStroke patients are usually admitted to hospital for their acute care and rehabilitation. Services to help acute stroke patients avoid admission to hospital ('hospital-at-home') have now been developed.ObjectivesTo establish the costs and effects of such services compared with conventional services.Search MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register in March 1999 and supplemented this through discussion with colleagues and trialists.Selection CriteriaControlled clinical trials recruiting stroke patients who have not been admitted to hospital and compare (1) services which provided support with an aim of helping prevent admission to hospital with (20 conventional services (which could include hospital admission).Data Collection And AnalysisTwo independent review authors determined the eligibility and methodological quality of trials. Trialists were then contacted to obtain standardised descriptive and outcome data.Main ResultsFour trials are included in the review, of which three currently have outcome data available (921 patients; 857 from one controlled trial, 64 from two randomised trials). There were no statistically significant differences between the patient and carer outcomes of the intervention and control groups either within individual trials or in pooled analyses. There was a trend toward greater hospital bed use and increased costs in the intervention groups.Authors' ConclusionsThere is currently no evidence from clinical trials to support a radical shift in the care of acute stroke patients from hospital-based care.

4 keywords...

hide…