• Injury · Apr 2024

    Review

    A scientometric analysis of bone cutting tools & methodologies: Mapping the research landscape.

    • Phanindra Addepalli, Worapong Sawangsri, and Saiful Anwar Che Ghani.
    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kasetsart University, Thailand. Electronic address: phanindra.a@ku.th.
    • Injury. 2024 Apr 1; 55 (4): 111458111458.

    AbstractThis study undertakes a Scientometric analysis of bone-cutting tools, investigating a corpus of 735 papers from the Scopus database between 1941 and 2023. It employs bibliometric methodologies such as keyword coupling, co-citation, and co-authorship analysis to map the intellectual landscape and collaborative networks within this research domain. The analysis highlights a growing interest and significant advancements in bone-cutting tools, focusing on their design, the materials used, and the cutting processes involved. It identifies key research fronts and trends, such as the emphasis on surgical precision, material innovation, and the optimization of tool performance. Further, the study reveals a broad collaboration among researchers from various disciplines, including engineering, materials science, and medical sciences, reflecting the field's interdisciplinary nature. Despite the progress, the analysis points out several gaps, notably in tool design optimization and the impact of materials on bone health. This comprehensive review not only charts the evolution of bone-cutting tool research but also calls attention to areas requiring further investigation, aiming to inspire future studies that address these identified gaps and enhance surgical outcomes.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…