• Charles Feldman, Gavin M Joynt, Spyros D Mentzelopoulos, Charles L Sprung, Alexander Avidan, and Guy A Richards.
• Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Electronic address: charles.feldman@wits.ac.za.
• J Crit Care. 2024 Mar 29; 82: 154797154797.

PurposeLimitations of life sustaining therapies (LLST) are frequent in intensive care units (ICUs), but no previous studies have examined end-of-life (EOL) care and LLST in South Africa (SA).Materials And MethodsThis study evaluated LLST in SA from the data of a prospective, international, multicentre, observational study (Ethicus-2) and compared practices with countries in the rest of the world.ResultsLLST was relatively common in SA, and withholding was more frequent than withdrawing therapy. However, withdrawing and withholding therapy were less common, while failed CPR was more common, than in many other countries. No patients had an advance directive. Primary reasons for LLST in SA were poor quality of life, multisystem organ failure and patients' unresponsiveness to maximal therapy. Primary considerations for EOL decision-making were good medical practice and patients' best-interest, with the need for an ICU bed only rarely considered.ConclusionsWithholding was more common than withdrawing treatment both in SA and worldwide, although both were significantly less frequent in SA compared with the world average.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

4 keywords...

hide…