• Samuel Wd Merriel, Stephanie Archer, Alice S Forster, David Eldred-Evans, John S McGrath, Hashim U Ahmed, Willie Hamilton, and Fiona M Walter.
• Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester; Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter.
• Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Apr 4.

BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate is a new, more accurate, non-invasive test for prostate cancer diagnosis.AimTo understand the acceptability of MRI for patients and GPs for prostate cancer diagnosis.Design And SettingQualitative study of men who had undergone a prostate MRI for possible prostate cancer, and GPs who had referred at least one man for possible prostate cancer in the previous 12 months in West London and Devon.MethodSemi-structured interviews, conducted in person or via telephone, were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Deductive thematic analysis was undertaken using Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, retrospectively for patients and prospectively for GPs.ResultsTwenty-two men (12 from Devon, age range 47-80 years), two patients' partners, and 10 GPs (6 female, age range 36-55 years) were interviewed. Prostate MRI was broadly acceptable for most patient participants, and they reported that it was not a significant undertaking to complete the scan. GPs were more varied in their views on prostate MRI, with a broad spectrum of knowledge and understanding of prostate MRI. Some GPs expressed concerns about additional clinical responsibility and local availability of MRI if direct access to prostate MRI in primary care were to be introduced.ConclusionProstate MRI appears to be acceptable to patients. Some differences were found between patients in London and Devon, mainly around burden of testing and opportunity costs. Further exploration of GPs' knowledge and understanding of prostate MRI could inform future initiatives to widen access to diagnostic testing in primary care.© The Authors.

6 keywords...

hide…