• Respiratory care · Apr 2024

    Quantitative CT scan and response to pronation in COVID-19 ARDS.

    • Francesco Zadek, Luca Berta, Giulia Zorzi, Stefania Ubiali, Amos Bonaiuti, Giulia Tundo, Beatrice Brunoni, Francesco Marrazzo, Riccardo Giudici, Anna Rossi, Francesco Rizzetto, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Angelo Vanzulli, Paola Enrica Colombo, Roberto Fumagalli, Alberto Torresin, and Thomas Langer.
    • Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
    • Respir Care. 2024 Apr 9.

    AbstractBackground: The use of the prone position (PP) has been widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic. While it has demonstrated benefits, including improved oxygenation and lung aeration, the factors influencing the response in terms of gas exchange to PP remain unclear. In particular, the association between baseline quantitative Computed Tomography (qCT) scan results and gas exchange response to PP in intubated, mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19 ARDS is unknown. The present study aimed to compare baseline qCT results between subjects responding to PP in terms of oxygenation or carbon dioxide (CO2) clearance and those who did not.Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective observational study, including critically ill, intubated, mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome admitted to the ICUs of Niguarda Hospital between March 2020 and November 2021. Blood-gas samples were collected before and after PP. Subjects in whom the PaO2/FiO2 increase was ≥ 20 mmHg after PP were defined as Oxygen responders (Oxy-R). CO2-responders (CO2R) were defined when the ventilatory ratio (VR) decreased during PP. Automated qCT analyses were performed to obtain tissue mass and density of the lungs.Results: One hundred twenty-five subjects were enrolled, of which 116 (93%) were Oxy-R and 51 (41%) CO2R. No difference in qCT characteristics and oxygen were observed between Oxy-R and Oxygen Non Responders (Tissue mass 1532 ±396 vs. 1654 ±304 g, p= .28; density -544±109 vs. -562±58 HU, p= .42). Similar findings were observed when dividing the population according to CO2 response (Tissue mass 1551±412 vs. 1534±377 g, p= .89; density -545±123 vs. -546±94 HU, p= .99).Conclusions: Most COVID-19 related ARDS subjects improve their oxygenation at the first pronation cycle. The study suggests that baseline qCT scan data are not associated with the response to PP in oxygenation or CO2 in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 related ARDS subjects.Copyright © 2024 by Daedalus Enterprises.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…