• Takuya Ogami, George J Arnaoutakis, Eric M Isselbacher, GeuzebroekGuillaume S CGSCDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Joseph S Coselli, Carlo De Vincentiis, Clayton A Kaiser, Stuart Hutchison, Qing-Guo Li, Derek R Brinster, Bradley G Leshnower, Derek Serna-Gallegos, Chih-Wen Pai, Bradley S Taylor, Himanshu J Patel, Kim A Eagle, and Ibrahim Sultan.
• Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2024 Apr 26.

ObjectiveWith an aging population and advancements in imaging, recurrence of thoracic aortic dissection is becoming more common.MethodsAll patients enrolled in the International Registry of Aortic Dissection from 1996 to 2023 with type A and type B acute aortic dissection were identified. Among them, initial dissection and recurrent dissection were discerned. The study period was categorized into 3 eras: historic era, 1996 to 2005; middle era, 2006 to 2015; most recent era, 2016 to 2023. Propensity score matching was applied between initial dissection and recurrent dissection. Outcome of interests included long-term survival and cumulative incidence of major aortic events defined by the composite of reintervention, aortic rupture, and new dissection.ResultsThe proportion of recurrent dissection increased from 5.9% in the historic era to 8.0% in the most recent era in the entire dissection cohort. In patients with type A dissection, propensity score matching between initial dissection and recurrent dissection yielded 326 matched pairs. Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar long-term survival between the 2 groups. However, the cumulative incidence of major aortic events was significantly higher in the recurrent dissection group (40.3% ± 6.2% vs 17.8% ± 5.1% at 4 years in the initial dissection group, P = .02). For type B dissection, 316 matched pairs were observed after propensity score matching. Long-term survival and the incidence of major aortic events were equivalent between the 2 groups.ConclusionsThe case volume of recurrent dissection or the ability to detect recurrent dissection has increased over time. Acute type A recurrent dissection was associated with a higher risk of major aortic events than initial dissection. Further judicious follow-up may be crucial after type A recurrent dissection.Copyright © 2024 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

4 keywords...

hide…