-
Observational Study
Diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake parameters to differentiate rheumatoid arthritis from other types of arthritis.
- Anu Bhattarai, Takahito Nakajima, Santosh Sapkota, Yukiko Arisaka, Azusa Tokue, Yukio Yonemoto, and Yoshito Tsushima.
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department of Medicine and Molecular Sciences Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine Research Program for Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Division of Integrated Oncology Research, Gunma University Initiative for Advanced Research (GIAR), Gunma, Japan.
- Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun 1; 96 (25): e7130e7130.
AbstractWe aimed evaluate F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake at major joints for differentiating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from those with non-RA arthritis using F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET).Eighteen patients with RA (13 women; age, 66.8 ± 13.2 years) and 17 patients with non-RA (6 women; age, 50.8 ± 12.5 years) were included. Twelve joints of each patient were examined: shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle on both sides. A visual scoring (VS) system was used; quantitative parameters such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic active volume (MAV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were evaluated. Total score and value of each parameter were compared between the RA and non-RA groups.Total VS score (mean, 37.7 ± 9.0 vs 21.9 ± 7.2; P < .0001) and SUVmax (mean, 28.1 ± 8.5 vs 17.9 ± 5.8; P < .001) were significantly higher in the RA group than in the non-RA group. A significant between-group difference was also observed with respect to total MAV (608.3 ± 370.7 vs 176.5 ± 217.8; P < .001) and total TLG (1139.3 ± 759.1 vs 289.5 ± 395.4; P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that total VS had the highest area under curve (.92), with sensitivity and specificity of 88.9% and 76.4%, respectively.Quantitative PET parameters could differentiate RA from non-RA. Total VS score, however, appears to be the best convenient qualitative tool for diagnosing RA.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.