• Hakan Ozoran and Jack Amiry.
• University of Oxford.
• Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jun 20; 74 (suppl 1).

BackgroundGP confidence and competence in relation to gender diversity and the discussion of related matters remains relatively unknown. Despite increasing demand on primary care in dealing with matters of gender identity; contention and confusion are unfortunately widely reported amongst doctors.AimWe sought to formally evaluate the level of GP training and gauge desire for further training in relation to the discussion of pronouns with patients.MethodWe used a structured questionnaire that was sent out to GPs in Oxfordshire, facilitated by a mailing list used by the Primary Care Undergraduate Teaching Department at the University of Oxford. Additionally, we performed structured individual interviews with GPs in Oxford, who provided their contact details and expressed interest when completing the questionnaire.ResultsFourty-four GPs responded and completed the questionnaire, five of whom agreed to participate in a structured interview. Most GPs (61%) had not received any formal training. Despite this, 68% of GPs did not want more formal training in the field of gender incongruence and pronoun usage. Only one GP routinely asked patients their pronouns (2%).ConclusionOur findings highlight that a significant proportion of GPs have no formal training in relation to discussing pronouns and gender incongruence. We believe GPs should have the skills necessary to appreciate, understand and provide structured support to those with concerns in relation to their gender identity. With waiting times for gender clinics frequently exceeding 2 years, our findings emphasise the increasing importance of GP specific training in the field of gender identity.© British Journal of General Practice 2024.

13 keywords...

hide…