• Critical care medicine · Jul 2024

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    A Randomized Noninferiority Trial to Compare Enteral to Parenteral Phosphate Replacement on Biochemistry, Waste, and Environmental Impact and Healthcare Cost in Critically Ill Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypophosphatemia.

    • Chinh D Nguyen, Haustine P Panganiban, Timothy Fazio, Amalia Karahalios, Melissa J Ankravs, Christopher M MacIsaac, Thomas Rechnitzer, Lucy Arno, An Tran-Duy, Scott McAlister, Ali AbdelhamidYasmineYDepartment of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia., and Adam M Deane.
    • Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
    • Crit. Care Med. 2024 Jul 1; 52 (7): 105410641054-1064.

    ObjectivesHypophosphatemia occurs frequently. Enteral, rather than IV, phosphate replacement may reduce fluid replacement, cost, and waste.DesignProspective, randomized, parallel group, noninferiority clinical trial.SettingSingle center, 42-bed state trauma, medical and surgical ICUs, from April 20, 2022, to July 1, 2022.PatientsPatients with serum phosphate concentration between 0.3 and 0.75 mmol/L.InterventionsWe randomized patients to either enteral or IV phosphate replacement using electronic medical record-embedded program.Measurement And Main ResultsOur primary outcome was serum phosphate at 24 hours with a noninferiority margin of 0.2 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes included cost savings and environmental waste reduction and additional IV fluid administered. The modified intention-to-treat cohort comprised 131 patients. Baseline phosphate concentrations were similar between the two groups. At 24 hours, mean ( sd ) serum phosphate concentration were enteral 0.89 mmol/L (0.24 mmol/L) and IV 0.82 mmol/L (0.28 mmol/L). This difference was noninferior at the margin of 0.2 mmol/L (difference, 0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.17 mmol/L). When assigned IV replacement, patients received 408 mL (372 mL) of solvent IV fluid. Compared with IV replacement, the mean cost per patient was ten-fold less with enteral replacement ($3.7 [$4.0] vs. IV: $37.7 [$31.4]; difference = $34.0 [95% CI, $26.3-$41.7]) and weight of waste was less (7.7 g [8.3 g] vs. 217 g [169 g]; difference = 209 g [95% CI, 168-250 g]). C O2 emissions were 60-fold less for comparable phosphate replacement (enteral: 2 g producing 14.2 g and 20 mmol of potassium dihydrogen phosphate producing 843 g of C O2 equivalents).ConclusionsEnteral phosphate replacement in ICU is noninferior to IV replacement at a margin of 0.2 mmol/L but leads to a substantial reduction in cost and waste.Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.