• C R McAndrew and P Harms.
• Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Mother's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland.
• Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003 Oct 1;31(5):514-7.

AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare the incidence of paraesthesiae during spinal needle insertion in a needle-through-needle combined spinal-epidural (CSE) versus a single-shot spinal (SSS) technique. Eighty-nine women presenting for elective caesarean section at a tertiary referral obstetric unit were randomized to receive either needle-through-needle CSE or SSS. Equipment used was a 16 gauge/26 gauge combined spinal-epidural kit and a 26 gauge pencil-point spinal needle with introducer (both Sims Portex, Australia) The presence and distribution of paraesthesiae was recorded by an observer at spinal needle insertion and again on day one postoperatively. There were three failures to perform the intended block. One patient was lost to follow-up at postoperative day one. Seventeen of forty-six (37%) women in the needle-through-needle CSE group and four of forty-three (9%) in the SSS group had paraesthesiae upon spinal needle insertion (P < 0.05, Chi-squared test). No patient had persistent neurological symptoms at postoperative day one. We postulate that the higher incidence of paraesthesiae with needle-through-needle CSE may be related to deeper penetration of the subarachnoid space with this technique.

29 keywords...

hide…