• Z Khalaf, S Saglani, and Chloe I Bloom.
• National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, England.
• Chest. 2024 Nov 7.

BackgroundGuidelines advise minimizing asthma exacerbation risk, which is achieved partially through good clinical practice activities, including scheduled asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks, and asthma management plans. We assessed how frequently these activities are provided and how effective they are in clinical practice.Research QuestionDo guideline-recommended activities such as asthma reviews, inhaler technique checks, and asthma management plans prevent asthma exacerbations?Study Design And MethodsThis retrospective chart review used United Kingdom primary care medical records between 2004 and 2021, linked to hospital records. Children were eligible from asthma diagnosis until age 16 years. Annual implementation of asthma review, inhaler technique check, and asthma management plan was measured. Risk factors for these activities not being undertaken were determined by using multivariable logistic regression. Self-controlled case series was adopted to assess the effectiveness of each activity over 12 months; this was divided into two 6-month periods.ResultsA total of 126,483 children were eligible; 30% to 45% received each annual activity, and 8% received all 3 together. Risk factors for not receiving activities included younger age, more socioeconomic deprivation, and higher or no BMI measurement. Management plans and asthma reviews, as standalone activities, were associated with an approximately 15% exacerbation reduction over 12 months and 8% over 6 months, respectively (asthma management plan, n = 4,624; 0-6 months [incidence rate ratio (95% CI)]: 0.87 [0.79-0.96]; 6-12 months: 0.83 [0.73-0.95]; asthma review, n = 6,948; 0-6 months: 0.92 [0.85-0.99]; 6-12 months: 0.93 [0.83-1.03]). Standalone inhaler technique checks were not associated with exacerbations. Provision of all activities together was associated with an approximately 30% exacerbation reduction over 12 months (n = 3,643; 0-6 months: incidence rate ratio, 0.76 [0.68-0.85]; 6-12 months: incidence rate ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60-0.81]).InterpretationMost children in the United Kingdom do not receive the guideline-recommended activities to monitor their asthma. This study suggests that these activities, if implemented, are effective in clinical practice and maximally effective when combined in the same visit.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

7 keywords...

hide…